Key Points
– The active vs. passive debate stretches beyond the question of whether active funds outperform their passive counterparts.
– Besides performance, other considerations are crucial in understanding the debate from both theoretical and practical standpoints.
The debate between active and passive investments has always revolved around whether active funds can outperform their passive counterparts. However, it’s essential to acknowledge that there are more critical considerations that investors need to take into account. These considerations are vital for understanding the foundational principles of the debate and elevating it from a theoretical discourse to a practical application.
## Can it be done?
Is it possible for any fund or investor to outperform a market index? The answer is yes, but this possibility hinges on several factors. The dispersion between the best- and worst-performing securities, the number of securities available in a given market, and the proportion of retail versus professional investors are crucial factors in determining the active opportunity. Not all markets provide the same level of active opportunity, making it essential for investors to assess the market dynamics before making a decision.
## Is it done?
The statistics on how many active funds have outperformed their respective market indices and the duration of that outperformance are typical focal points in the active vs. passive debate. However, the analysis of these statistics can be misleading. The difficulty in outperforming market indices does not render fund picking as an impossible or meritless endeavor. Additionally, fund managers’ choices in expressing their investment philosophy through a particular investment style necessitate underperformance at times. This approach may not align with retail investors’ knowledge and preferences, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive analysis.
## Can I do it?
The most pertinent question for any investor is whether they possess the ability to outperform the market. While some investors may have an edge in picking outperforming stocks and funds, reversion to the mean often brings them back to reality. Furthermore, investors may exhibit overconfidence in their fund-picking abilities, often relying on past performance and portfolio analytics. This practice is not without its flaws, as the assessment process is cumbersome and opaque, creating an information gap that hampers the ability of many investors to make well-informed decisions.
In light of these considerations, it is important for investors to critically assess their ability to pick good funds and trust their advisors. If these assessments yield unfavorable results, a passive investment approach may be the most suitable option.
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
*All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.*
Image credit: ©Getty Images / Grant Faint
**Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members**
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.
