- The total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies is above the $2 trillion threshold.
- Tokens are smart contracts based on a blockchain, while coins are the native tokens of a particular blockchain.
- Raising capital through token financing requires convincing investors of the value of participating in the token sale.
- There is no strong correlation between changes in token volume and token price, indicating the price is not solely determined by the popularity of the token’s associated product.
- Speculation plays a significant role in the performance of tokens, as seen with meme tokens like Shiba Inu.
- There is also no strong correlation between coin volume and coin price, suggesting that coin utilization does not significantly impact prices.
- Crypto investing differs from equity investing in terms of dividend distribution and buyouts.
- Currency investing is a zero-sum game, where one investor’s profit is another investor’s loss.
- Fiat currencies have been losing value, but this trend may not last unless blockchains provide more utility beyond speculation.
Much of the crypto world is, by definition, cryptic and difficult to understand. But two crypto trends are crystal clear: Both talent and money are flooding into the digital currency market. Almost every day brings a fresh announcement of software developers from Google or financiers from JPMorgan joining crypto start-ups that are about to revolutionize something.
Indeed, while the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies has fallen from its previous heights, it is still above the $2 trillion threshold. That’s the equivalent in value of the entire German stock market, which includes such blue-chip companies as Siemens, BMW, and Volkswagen.
It is as easy to invest in crypto today as it is in equities, but what is actually being bought is not as clear. When investors purchase Shiba Inu — a token with a $15 billion market capitalization and a Shiba Inu hunting dog mascot — SHIB tokens are deposited into their digital wallets. But what do they really own? And what drives SHIB’s performance?
Before diving in, we first need to define some basic crypto terminology: A token is a smart contract based on a blockchain, and a crypto coin is the native token of a particular blockchain. For example, ETH is the coin of the Ethereum blockchain, but SHIB is a token based on Ethereum. While all coins are tokens, not all tokens are coins.
The number of tokens has exploded over the last couple of years, and tokens now outnumber coins by a factor of eight. Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain account for a combined 85% or so of the market share of the blockchain infrastructure layer where tokens are bought and sold. This raises the question of whether all of the 1,000 or so coins currently available are necessary. Over the long term, they probably aren’t.
Crypto start-ups are financed through equity and tokens. Raising capital via equity means issuing shares that are privately held by angel investors, venture capitalists, and the like. These shares represent an ownership stake that entitles the recipients to dividends and proceeds when the company is sold.
Token financing is very different: It gives investors no legal claim to the underlying business. As a consequence, token and equity investing are not really comparable.
Naturally, start-ups pursuing token financing need to convince investors there is value to be gained by participating in the token sale. The typical pitch is that the start-up’s product requires the use of tokens. This can create rather complex ecosystems that resemble small economies with their assorted stakeholders: The start-up is the equivalent of the government, the product a stand-in for goods, the users for consumers, and the token for the currency or medium of exchange.
The relationship between the product of the start-up and the underlying token is not straightforward, however, and is thus hard to evaluate.
The best way for token investors to understand the value of their holding is to interpret the change in token volume as a proxy for the demand of the associated product. The more popular the product, the higher the demand for the token, which should reflect an increasing volume of the token on the exchange.
But that relationship doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The rolling correlation between changes in token volume and token price across all tokens between 2014 and 2022, on both a monthly and annual basis, is close to zero. This indicates that there is no positive relationship between the business of the start-up and the price of its token.
But what about the correlation between token volume and the price for all tokens? The crypto space has its share of bad actors, and some token issuers may be more interested in fleecing underinformed investors than in building long-term businesses.
So, what if we limit our universe to only the most successful tokens by market capitalization: the top 1,000, the top 100, the top 50, and the top 10? The last of these categories has a combined market cap of approximately $100 billion and includes Chainlink and Uniswap. These tokens are associated with products that have some of the largest user bases in the crypto community. If they were normal companies, their equity would be quite valuable.
Again, the correlation between volume and price is negligible no matter how it’s measured. So, perhaps product and token have no bearing on one another in the crypto space.
But if product utility doesn’t drive token performance, what does? The obvious answer is speculation.
In cases like Shiba Inu, this is pretty obvious. SHIB is a meme token with no underlying product. At best, it is a gamble on other investors piling in and driving up the price. This represents speculation in its purest form. Investors are simply playing a game of musical chairs and betting that they will find a seat before the music stops.
But tokens are only one side of the crypto equation. What about coins? Do they exhibit the same dynamic? Theoretically, the price of both tokens and coins should be driven by their utilization. With tokens, the price should be determined by the business. But as we’ve seen, that relationship is hard to verify.
The price of coins, on the other hand, ought to depend on the number of transactions occurring on their associated blockchains. The more start-ups launch their tokens on Ethereum, presumably the greater the demand and the higher the prices for ETH coins.
But again, the correlation between coin volume and price was just as low as it was for tokens. This suggests the utility of coins does not have a significant bearing on their prices either.
Maybe there’s no relationship between coins and their utilization via bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), the two coins with the largest market capitalizations of $900 billion and $400 billion, respectively. The correlations did not exceed 0.5 for either of these over the last six years.
Of course, the correlation between stock price and trading volume is also quite low, so the premise of this analysis is easy to challenge. Plenty of bear markets over the decades have seen the stock prices of companies with great fundamentals fall. Both tokens and stocks at times benefit and suffer from investor greed and fear.
So, what’s the difference between crypto and equity investing? The key distinction is that great companies can distribute earnings as dividends to shareholders regardless of the market environment. There is no parallel in cryptocurrency investing. There is also no equivalent of the buyout when equity investors are paid a premium for their shares.
Even worse, currency investing is a zero-sum game. For every investor who profits from a USD or BTC position, another loses the equivalent amount.
Fortunately for crypto investors, fiat currencies have been on the losing side of this trade for a while now. But that trend is unlikely to last long unless blockchains start providing more utility and become more than mere vehicles for speculation.
