Share on:

Notion doesn’t all the time match actuality. We suspected this can be the case in relation to the broadly held perception that Bitcoin is significantly extra risky than different asset lessons.

We examined our idea by revisiting Mieszko Mazur’s 2022 paper, “Misperceptions of Bitcoin Volatility.” On this weblog publish, we are going to talk about Mazur’s methodology, refresh his information, and illustrate why it’s finest to method the subject of Bitcoin volatility analytically and with an open thoughts.

The Starting

Bitcoin started its journey as an esoteric whitepaper revealed within the hinterlands of the World Vast Net in 2008. As of mid-2024, nevertheless, its market capitalization sits at a formidable ~$1.3 trillion, and it’s now the “poster baby” of digital belongings. “Valuation of Cryptoassets: A Guide for Investment Professionals,” from the CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Middle, evaluations the instruments out there to worth cryptoassets together with Bitcoin.

The specter of Bitcoin’s volatility from its early days looms giant and is omnipresent in any dialogue about its standing as a forex or its intrinsic worth. Vanguard CEO Tim Buckley lately dismissed the potential for together with the cryptoasset in long-term portfolios, saying that Bitcoin is too volatile. Does his notion match actuality?

Mazur’s Findings

Mazur’s research targeted on the months previous, throughout, and after the March 2020 inventory market crash triggered by the COVID-19 disaster (e.g., the market crash interval). His key intention was to discern Bitcoin’s comparative resilience and worth conduct surrounding a market crash interval. He targeted on three indicators: relative rating of each day realized volatility, each day realized volatility, and range-based realized volatility.

Right here’s what he discovered:

Relative Rating of Day by day Realized Volatility

  • Bitcoin’s return fluctuations had been decrease than roughly 900 shares within the S&P 1500 and 190 shares within the S&P 500 in the course of the months previous, throughout, and after the March 2020 inventory market crash.
  • Throughout the market crash interval, Bitcoin was much less risky than belongings like oil, EU carbon credit, and choose bonds.

Day by day Realized Volatility

  • Over the previous decade, there was a major decline in Bitcoin’s each day realized volatility.

Vary-Based mostly Realized Volatility

  • Bitcoin’s range-based realized volatility of Bitcoin was considerably greater than the usual measure, utilizing each day returns.
  • Its range-based realized volatility was decrease than an extended checklist of S&P 1500 constituents in the course of the market crash interval.

Do these conclusions carry over to the current day?

Our Methodology

We analyzed information from late 2020 to early 2024. For sensible causes, our information sources for sure belongings diverged from these used within the authentic research and we selected to emphasise standardized percentile rankings for ease of interpretation. We examined the identical three indicators, nevertheless: relative rating of each day realized volatility1, each day realized volatility2, and range-based realized volatility3. As well as, for carbon credit, we used an ETF proxy (KRBN) as an alternative of the EU carbon credit Mazur utilized in his research. BTC/USD was the forex pair analyzed.

Relative Day by day Realized Volatility: An Up to date View

In Exhibit 1, greater percentiles denote larger volatility with respect to the constituents of the S&P 1500. From November 2020 to February 2024, Bitcoin’s each day realized volatility rank equated to the ~76th percentile relative to the S&P 1500 on common.

Exhibit 1. Bitcoin’s Day by day Realized Volatility Percentile Rank vs. S&P 1500

Sources and Notes: EODHD; grey areas characterize Market Shocks and better percentile = greater volatility.

For subsequent market crises, Bitcoin’s relative volatility rankings had greater peaks in comparison with the crash triggered by COVID-19 however related ranges for essentially the most half. Notably, as depicted in Exhibit 2, in Could 2020 and December 2022 Bitcoin was much less risky than the median S&P 1500 inventory.

Exhibit 2. Bitcoin’s Day by day Realized Volatility Throughout Market Shocks

Sources & Notes: Mazur (2022) and EODHD; the COVID-19 Crash ranks and each day realized volatility are derived instantly from the unique research. Rank of 1 = highest volatility worth; percentiles are inverted such that greater percentiles = greater volatility worth.

Exhibit 3. Bitcoin’s Day by day Realized Volatility vs. Different Belongings Throughout Market Shocks

Sources and Notes: EODHD, FRED, S&P International, Tullet Prebon, and Yahoo! Finance; numbers are the utmost each day realized volatilities for the indicated time interval.

Absolute Day by day Realized Volatility: An Up to date View

True to Mazur’s findings, Bitcoin’s volatility continued to development downward and skilled progressively decrease peaks. Between 2017 and 2020, there have been a number of episodes of spikes that surpassed annualized volatility of 100%. Information from 2021 onward painted a unique image.

  • 2021 peak: 6.1% (97.3% annualized) in Could.
  • 2022 peak: 5.5% (87.9% annualized) in June.
  • 2023 peak: 4.1% (65.7% annualized) in March.

Exhibit 4. Day by day Realized Volatility over Time

Supply: EODHD.

Vary-Based mostly Realized Volatility: An Up to date View

Per Mazur’s findings, range-based realized volatility was 1.74% greater than each day realized volatility, although this was not solely stunning given our chosen calculation. Bitcoin’s range-based realized volatility was within the ~79th percentile relative to the S&P 1500 on common.

Exhibit 5. Vary-Based mostly Realized Volatility over Time and Percentile Rating Relative to S&P 1500

Supply: EODHD. Notice: Rank of 1 = highest volatility worth; percentiles are inverted such that greater percentiles = greater volatility worth.

Findings

Of all of Mazur’s conclusions, the discovering pertaining to Bitcoin’s relative each day realized volatility didn’t maintain up in our evaluation, as a result of its efficiency relative to different asset lessons throughout market shocks degraded. Conversely, most of Mazur’s findings, together with daily- and range-based realized volatility of Bitcoin, nonetheless maintain true.

Relative Rating of Volatility: Diminished in Energy

  • With respect to the market shocks that adopted the COVID-19 crash analyzed within the research, Bitcoin’s each day realized volatility percentile rankings had been akin to the S&P 1500.
  • Nevertheless, Bitcoin’s each day realized volatility was larger than virtually all chosen asset lessons and confirmed the best each day volatility throughout market shocks, aside from oil and carbon credit in the course of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Day by day Realized Volatility Over Time: Bolstered

  • Per Mazur’s findings, we discovered {that a} longer time horizon helps us cut back “cherry selecting.” As such, Bitcoin’s each day realized volatility has proven a gradual but clear decline over time, with decrease peaks noticed over the previous few years.

Vary-Based mostly Realized Volatility: Bolstered

  • On common, month-to-month range-based realized volatility has been 1.74% greater than each day realized volatility since November 2020.
  • Bitcoin’s range-based realized volatility was nonetheless decrease than a number of hundred names from the S&P 1500 on a median month-to-month foundation.

Key Takeaways

Our replace of Mazur’s research discovered that Bitcoin is just not as risky as perceived. This was evidenced by its percentile rankings in comparison with the constituents of the S&P 1500, the disparity between its each day realized and range-based realized volatility, and the gradual decline of its each day realized volatility over time.

With mainstream adoption of Bitcoin growing alongside additional rules, the notion of its volatility will proceed to evolve. This evaluation of Mazur’s analysis underscores the significance of approaching this matter analytically and with an open thoughts. Perceptions don’t all the time match actuality.


Footnotes

Share on:
FX Bubbles: Through the Lens of Shiller and Sornette

Previous Post :

The Interplay Between Cap Rates and Interest Rates

Next Post :

Author : Editorial Staff

Editorial Staff at FinancialAdvisor webportal is a team of experts. We have been creating blogs about finance & investment.

Related Posts

Distress Investing: Crime Scene Investigation
Revisiting the Factor Zoo: How Time Horizon Impacts the Efficacy of Investment Factors
How Machine Learning Is Transforming Portfolio Optimization
Dangers and Opportunities Posed by the AI Skills Gap in Investment Management

Leave a Comment