Share on:

As a inventory’s nominal share value falls, what occurs to its danger profile? The reply to this query has essential implications for managing investor expectations and decreasing portfolio turnover. Afterall, buyers typically deviate from their chosen long-term methods as a result of emotional reactions to unanticipated market actions. These market-timing actions current their very own type of danger, including to the prevailing danger of unpredictable markets.

Some would argue that as a inventory approaches the decrease finish of penny inventory territory, volatility will average as a result of there’s an inherent threshold beneath which the worth can not drop. Others would contend that the inventory will turn into extra delicate to market actions as a result of market circumstances dictate the survival of the corporate.

We investigated what occurs to systematic danger and the full volatility of a inventory when it turns into a penny inventory, i.e., its value drops beneath $5 per share. The outcomes might shock you. We discovered that as a inventory declines in worth, it turns into extra delicate to market actions. In different phrases, its beta will increase and its whole volatility will increase accordingly.

We pulled inventory returns on all NASDAQ- and NYSE-listed companies going again 50 years. We examined shares that in the course of the 50-year interval crossed the brink of $1 a share, $2.50 a share, or $5 a share. We captured the cases when every inventory crossed these thresholds for the primary time. We then famous the beta of the shares earlier than the brink crossovers and in contrast them to the identical betas of the shares two years after the crossover date.

The Findings

The primary fascinating discovering is that when a inventory dips beneath the $1 threshold, on common, its beta goes from 0.93 to 1.57. A beta larger than 1.0 means a inventory’s value is extra risky than the general market, i.e., its value swings extra wildly. The alternative is true of a beta lower than 1.0.

The bounce in beta to 1.57 from 0.93 for the shares that dipped beneath the $1 threshold represents a big shift in danger profiles. Actually, it’s statistically important at 1%. On the $1 threshold, the common penny inventory has way more systematic danger and whole volatility. And this shift is throughout the board. Shares with detrimental betas go from a mean of -0.62 to 1.14. Shares with betas between 0 and 1.0 go from 0.55 to 1.37. And shares with betas larger than 1.0 go from 1.95 to 1.88.

What occurs to systematic danger and the full volatility of a inventory when it turns into a penny inventory:
Beta Earlier than Worth DropBeta 2 Years After Worth Drop
Common Worth Drop Cutoff: $1/share0.931.57
Beta beneath 0-0.621.14
Beta between 0 and 1.00.551.37
Beta larger than 1.01.951.88
Beta Earlier than Worth DropBeta 2 Years After Worth Drop
Common Worth Drop Cutoff: $2.50/share0.901.56
Beta beneath 0-0.551.01
Beta between 0 and 1.00.521.27
Beta larger than 1.01.901.94
Beta Earlier than Worth DropBeta 2 Years After Worth Drop
Common Worth Drop Cutoff: $5/share1.001.07
Beta beneath 0-0.56-0.51
Beta between 0 and 1.00.470.50
Beta larger than 1.02.022.17

The outcomes spotlight that this drastic improve in danger (volatility) is totally as a result of will increase in systematic danger, i.e., motion with the market index. Notably, these outcomes aren’t pushed by a reversion to the imply over time in betas.

On the excessive finish of our research, we examined when shares cross the $5 a share barrier. The outcomes look fairly totally different. Earlier than a inventory crossed the $5 threshold, on common, its beta is 1.0 and afterward it’s 1.07.  The opposite beta tiers at $5 a share confirmed the identical outcomes. This affirms that the $1 threshold outcomes are really as a result of inventory coming into penny inventory territory.

The outcomes help the concept that penny shares turn into way more dangerous (larger volatility) as they method the zero-price barrier and that this danger is because of will increase in systematic danger (elevated sensitivity to market actions).

For those who appreciated this put up, don’t overlook to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the creator. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.


Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can report credit simply utilizing their online PL tracker.

Share on:
Managing Regret Risk: The Role of Asset Allocation

Previous Post :

AI to the Rescue? Overhauling the US Power Grid on the Path to Net Zero

Next Post :

Author : Editorial Staff

Editorial Staff at FinancialAdvisor webportal is a team of experts. We have been creating blogs about finance & investment.

Related Posts

Distress Investing: Crime Scene Investigation
Revisiting the Factor Zoo: How Time Horizon Impacts the Efficacy of Investment Factors
How Machine Learning Is Transforming Portfolio Optimization
Dangers and Opportunities Posed by the AI Skills Gap in Investment Management

Leave a Comment