Since their emergence within the Nineteen Seventies, outlined contribution (DC) plans in the USA have advanced. One notable change has been a shift in how they develop funding lineups for participant-directed DC plans. Plan sponsors are progressing from merely utilizing generally held funding beliefs to making a construction that deliberately considers the traits and wishes of their distinctive group of contributors.

On this article, I define the method for creating such a construction from an asset class perspective. A key element to considerate DC plan funding design is crafting a diversified funding construction earlier than deciding on particular funding autos.

Regulatory Basis & Steering for Funding Menu Construction

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) mandates that plan fiduciaries act prudently and diversify the plan’s investments to attenuate the chance of huge losses. By offering a higher diploma of asset class diversification, plan sponsors can allow extra alternatives for contributors who self-direct their retirement account to mitigate funding threat.

For DC plans topic to ERISA, there are a number of prescriptive necessities, together with a principles-based normal of care (responsibility of loyalty and responsibility of care) that plan fiduciaries should observe when constructing a plan’s funding construction. Even for plans not topic to ERISA, many plan sponsors think about the rules set forth below ERISA as finest observe and select to implement them.

Usually, ERISA part 404(c) supplies DC plan fiduciaries safety from the legal responsibility for participant funding selections if they provide a minimal of three diversified funding choices that bear materially totally different threat and return traits, akin to fairness, mounted revenue, and money equivalents.

In observe, it’s fairly uncommon for an funding construction to be restricted to only three funding choices. It’s because many funding fiduciaries consider that providing a bigger, diversified alternative set is helpful for contributors. Beneath the Pension Safety Act of 2006, sure pre-diversified funding choices, akin to Goal Date Funds (TDFs), are thought of certified default funding alternate options (QDIA), which supplies a secure harbor to mitigate fiduciary threat.

The US Division of Labor (DOL) supplies steering for the choice of TDFs in addition to periodic critiques of continued suitability. The DOL steering is finest observe and plan sponsors ought to leverage it when evaluating TDF utilization of their plan’s funding construction. Plan sponsors ought to set up a structured course of that first identifies a TDF philosophy after which critiques participant demographic information, together with retirees, to overview and finally choose an applicable TDF suite. The identical participant information overview can be helpful when assessing a plan’s core funding construction.

Past ERISA necessities and optionally available secure harbor provisions, DC plans’ named funding fiduciaries and their 3(21) funding advisors and three(38) funding managers have wide-ranging funding construction flexibility if selections are made in the perfect curiosity of contributors and beneficiaries. Such flexibility permits for an array of appropriate funding choices, which may be overwhelming for plan sponsors.

Crafting a Sturdy Funding Construction

Whereas the variability of DC plan participant teams’ wants and traits precludes a set formulation of a “proper” or “improper” funding lineup design course of, plan sponsors ought to keep a prudent and documented choice course of to fulfill their fiduciary obligations below ERISA.

A complete design course of is multi-step, calls for engagement by a plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee, and is finest led by a professional retirement plan advisor who’s dedicated to facilitating committee conversations and getting ready demographic and fund utilization critiques, amongst different duties.

A Pattern Course of in Seven Steps

1. Determine a objective & goals assertion

Determine the corporate’s philosophy in regards to the DC plan’s major objective and goals. Pattern statements and their potential influence on funding construction:

Objective: It is vital that our DC plan replicate the corporate’s purpose to advertise a tradition of “retirement atmosphere.” This is able to manifest as: lengthy worker tenure, staff who generally retire from our firm, and retirees who discover it enticing to retain their DC plan accounts within the employer’s plan all through retirement.

Potential influence: The aim assertion may counsel that plan asset lessons and TDFs assist a retiree’s have to diversify mounted revenue allocations, as a result of mounted revenue usually turns into a bigger portion of an investor’s portfolio close to all through retirement.

Objective: It is vital that our DC plan additional the corporate’s purpose of supporting staff as they save and make investments for retirement. We observe that our firm has a protracted historical past of using principally early-career individuals, and based mostly on previous expertise, we anticipate excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements from the corporate. When retirements happen, we observe that accounts are faraway from the DC plan shortly thereafter.

Potential influence: The aim assertion may benefit the inclusion of a number of fairness asset lessons and core or core plus mounted revenue as a result of, for the non-TDF investor phase, this design would offer for satisfactory fairness diversification, whereas minimizing the necessity to allocate to separate mounted revenue sub-asset lessons. It additionally may lend itself to a TDF designed for top fairness allocations early in its glide path and low-to-moderate fairness allocations (relative to the TDF universe common) close to the goal retirement age.

2. What p.c of contributors are enrolled in managed account companies and/or self-directed brokerage accounts?

Participant enrollment in a managed account service is usually low sufficient that it doesn’t affect the plan’s general funding construction, other than making certain the service’s minimal required asset lessons are included. But when the managed account service serves because the plan’s QDIA, and retention within the QDIA is excessive, establish the asset lessons the managed account supplier will use and never use. Carry out a cost-benefit evaluation of together with asset lessons past these required by the managed service supplier.

3. Develop a participant group profile to grasp the plan’s traders.

A DC plan’s participant group profile ought to be based mostly on demographics and investor kind. Since every plan’s participant group has various demographic traits, don’t depend on participant group averages for data akin to age, compensation, schooling degree, and firm tenure. Analyzing averages typically fails to replicate the breadth of a plan’s distinctive participant group, in addition to any concentrated segments that symbolize the most important variety of contributors.

When growing the participant group profile, consider what finest describes the largest variety of contributors. Plan sponsors might divide contributors into the next classes:

a. Investor kind

The “do it for me” kind: Individuals who elect to put money into the QDIA; any fund with broad asset allocation, akin to goal threat or different asset allocation funds; or a managed account service.
The “do it myself” kind: Individuals who elect to take a position principally in particular person asset class funds or a self-directed brokerage account.

If “do it for me” is the plan’s predominant investor kind, the funding construction might or might not have to include greater than the first asset lessons relying on the profile of the “do it myself” traders. For instance, if the “do it myself” traders have a excessive degree of funding proficiency or are prone to have their very own private funding advisors, the funding construction could also be justifiably extra complete. Nonetheless, relying on the traits and variety of the “do it myself” traders, advert hoc requests from contributors for particular sub-asset class choices and different funding autos could also be finest addressed by providing a self-directed brokerage choice.

b. Demographic profile

Determine the quantity and p.c of contributors by age vary and investor kind.
Search for any prevalent age cohorts. Understanding the focus in every age cohort can sign consideration for particular wants.

c. Funding proficiency of non-QDIA traders

Rank the committee’s notion of participant funding proficiency as excessive, medium, or low. Funding proficiency may be estimated based mostly on how effectively the “do it myself” group makes use of non-QDIA asset lessons. For instance, is there a sample of choosing few asset lessons, and does the sample differ by age cohort?
It’s affordable to anticipate early-career contributors to make use of fewer asset lessons. For this cohort, there may be prone to be a concentrate on equities over mounted revenue. It’s affordable to imagine the chosen variety of asset lessons would improve for mid- and late-career cohorts as a result of diversification and threat mitigation are likely to grow to be extra valued.
One other approach to observe funding proficiency is through the use of a scatter plot of participant fairness/mounted revenue allocation splits by age, in comparison with a pattern TDF allocation. The plan’s recordkeeper ought to be capable of present this data. If the scatter plot exhibits large dispersion from the pattern TDF allocation, it’s affordable to imagine funding proficiency is probably going low. A low diploma of funding proficiency can affect whether or not the funding construction designed for non-QDIA traders may be streamlined by excluding non-core asset lessons, akin to commodities.

d. Draw back threat tolerance

Utilizing an analogous low-medium-high score system, gauge draw back threat tolerance of the most important participant phase. Draw back threat tolerance is a vital think about intentional funding construction design and QDIA choice.

To assist establish participant draw back threat tolerance, plan sponsors can:

Assessment recordkeeping experiences of transfers into and out of funding choices throughout calendar quarters instantly following a market downturn or massive loss in a particular asset class.
If the trade doesn’t require post-secondary schooling for many staff, draw back threat tolerance is comparatively low and most plan sponsors will eclude asset lessons topic to extra frequent and important losses. Alternatively, if superior ranges of schooling are required, plan sponsors might wish to assume a average to excessive degree of draw back threat tolerance.

e. Stability of workforce

If turnover and liquidations by laid-off staff are excessive, it’s affordable to imagine that the funding construction and any TDFs provided ought to lean towards a low draw back threat profile.

f. Presence of an outlined profit pension plan

Along with the DC plan, does the corporate additionally sponsor an outlined profit pension plan that it intends to maintain lively with continued profit accruals? Does it present satisfactory, focused substitute revenue to long-term staff? If sure, does the corporate view the DC plan as “supplemental”? On this occasion, it’s affordable to imagine that the funding construction of the DC plan could also be restricted to broad, core asset lessons.

4. Assessment the variety of asset class choices.

The variety of asset lessons ought to be knowledgeable by the plan’s objective and goals assertion and participant group profile, slightly than proactively setting an arbitrary restrict on the variety of asset lessons. The latter motion might lead to plan sponsors overlooking the perfect pursuits and wishes of “do it myself” traders. As the preferred QDIA, TDFs enable much less engaged contributors, or these with decrease funding proficiency, to keep away from confusion or challenges in making asset allocation selections.

The typical variety of funding choices has declined as a result of contributors who’re much less snug making knowledgeable funding selections now have higher entry to pre-diversified choices like TDFs or managed accounts. For reference, the typical variety of funding choices (not asset lessons) provided by plans is presently 21. The three highest ranges by respondents have been:

1 to fifteen choices: 21.5%,
16 to twenty choices: 26.2%
26 or extra: 25.9%

5. Keep away from sophisticated funding menu design.

If the participant group profile suggests a streamlined funding construction and variety of funding choices, maintain the next factors in thoughts.

A number of funding choices in the identical asset lessons: Supply just one choice per asset class until the choices encompass an lively and passive implementation.
World fairness and stuck revenue: If the funding construction has separate home and worldwide asset lessons, world asset lessons might lead to unintended overlap.
Sector, regional, and country-specific asset lessons, excluding actual property funding trusts (REITs): These asset lessons have higher threat publicity resulting from their extra particular or concentrated nature and different areas of the funding construction additionally possible have publicity to them. Remember that this may occasionally result in overlap and unintentional, massive allocations to particular areas of the market.
Single-commodity asset lessons: If commodities are applicable for the plan’s funding construction, the diversification impact of together with a car with broad-based commodity publicity might assist mitigate the chance related to publicity to a single commodity, akin to gold, oil, or small teams of commodities like valuable metals.
Goal threat: Goal threat funds, which keep a hard and fast or restricted vary of fairness versus mounted revenue, are vulnerable to unintentional misuse by contributors who stay in the identical fund for longer than applicable, slightly than shifting to lower-risk, lower-equity allocation variations as their time horizons lower.
Cash market and steady worth funds: Steady worth funds have traditionally outperformed cash market funds as a result of they’ll put money into intermediate-term bonds and keep principal safety by means of wrap insurance coverage. Together with each cash market and steady worth funds can complicate participant asset motion as a result of cash market funds are deemed “competing funds” to steady worth. Steady worth funds don’t allow direct transfers to competing funds akin to cash market or different low-duration mounted revenue funds.

6. Assessment historic efficiency previous to asset class choice.

Assessment historic efficiency for the final 10 years of all asset lessons thought of for lineup inclusion to establish asset lessons which are too unstable or topic to massive losses. It will assist the committee perceive their historic patterns and magnitude of features and losses. Deal with the most important features and largest losses for every asset class through the 10-year interval. Assessment the usual deviation for five- and 10-year intervals.

7. Replace the group’s funding coverage assertion to doc permissible asset lessons.

Examine the DC plan’s Funding Coverage Assertion (IPS) to substantiate it expressly permits the specified asset lessons. Amend the IPS, if wanted, earlier than making funding construction adjustments to the plan menu.

Placing the Participant Group Profile into Observe

Listed below are two potential situations and the ensuing pattern funding buildings:

Participant Group A:

Plan objective assertion: It is vital that our DC plan helps the corporate’s purpose of making a “retirement atmosphere” tradition that promotes lengthy tenure of employment with frequent retirements from our firm, and for retirees to search out it enticing to retain their plan accounts all through retirement.
Plan presently gives a managed account service.
The “do it myself” traders symbolize 60% of contributors. The biggest age cohort is ages 50-80, and contributors have a excessive degree of funding proficiency.
Eighty p.c of retirees go away their account within the plan for the long run and take systematic withdrawals following retirement.
The “do it for me” traders symbolize 40% of contributors. The biggest age cohort is the 21-40-year vary, and contributors have a excessive degree of funding proficiency.
The workforce is steady and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Urged asset lessons:

Home fairness
- Giant cap: development, core, and worth
- Mid cap: development, core, and worth
- Small cap: development, core, and worth
Worldwide fairness
- Giant cap: development, core, and worth
Mounted revenue
- Treasury inflation-protected securities
Worldwide mounted revenue
Broad-based commodities
Asset allocation (TDFs)

Participant Group B:

Plan objective assertion: It is vital that our DC plan displays the corporate’s purpose of making a tradition that helps staff as they save and make investments for retirement. Our group tends to make use of predominantly early profession individuals. We anticipate and have traditionally skilled excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements. When retirements happen, accounts are faraway from the plan shortly thereafter.
Plan doesn’t presently provide a managed account service.
The “do it myself” traders symbolize 20% of contributors. The biggest age cohort is 40-45 years, and contributors have a average degree of funding proficiency.
Plan gives a self-directed brokerage choice, utilized by roughly half of the “do it myself” traders.
The few contributors that stay within the plan previous age 65 have traditionally rolled over their accounts to particular person retirement accounts inside two years post-retirement.
The “do it for me” traders symbolize 80% of contributors and there aren’t any age cohorts with a materially increased focus than others. Individuals are assumed to have a low degree of funding proficiency.
The workforce is steady and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Urged asset lessons:

Home fairness
Worldwide fairness
Mounted revenue
Worldwide mounted revenue
Asset allocation (TDFs)

Empowering Plan Sponsors

Utilizing an knowledgeable, structured funding design course of will bolster DC plan sponsor confidence that funding lineup choice selections are tailor-made to the wants of most plan contributors. The funding menu design course of ought to allow the plan sponsor to really feel educated about how the group arrived at its plan’s funding construction and why, in addition to present the knowledge essential to doc a prudent decision-making course of, a key tenant of fiduciary responsibility below ERISA.

In the event you favored this submit, don’t overlook to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Research and Policy Center.

All posts are the opinion of the creator(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.

The fabric introduced herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed dependable. Such data shouldn’t be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.

PNC might present hyperlinks to different websites. Content material on such websites is supplied solely for the consumer’s comfort. PNC makes no guarantee of any variety concerning that content material and linking to such content material doesn’t represent or point out sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation in any means.

The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution shouldn’t be registered as a municipal advisor below the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Client Safety Act.

“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can file credit simply utilizing their online PL tracker.